Enhancing Visibility of Vendor Accessibility Documentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i3.10240Abstract
With higher education increasingly being online or having online components, it is important to ensure that online materials are accessible for persons with print and other disabilities. Library-related research has focused on the need for academic libraries to have accessible websites, in part to reach patrons who are participating in distance-education programs. A key component of a library’s website, however, is the materials it avails to patrons through vendor platforms outside the direct control of the library, making it more involved to address accessibility concerns. Librarians must communicate the need for accessible digital files to vendors so they will prioritize it. In much the same way as contracted workers constructing a physical space for a federal or federally funded agency must follow ADA standards for accessibility, so software vendors should be required to design virtual spaces to be accessible. A main objective of this study was to determine a method of increasing the visibility of vendor accessibility documentation for the benefit of our users. It is important that we, as service providers for the public good, act as a bridge between vendors and the patrons we serve.
References
Neil Savage, “Weaving the Web,” Communications of the ACM 60, no. 6 (June 2017): 22.
Ruth Colker, “The Americans with Disabilities Act is Outdated,” Drake Law Review 63, no. 3 (2015): 799.
Colker, “The Americans with Disabilities Act,” 817; Joanne Oud, “Accessibility of Vendor-Created Database Tutorials for People with Disabilities,” Information Technology and Libraries 35, no. 4 (2016): 13–14.
Laura DeLancey and Kirsten Ostergaard, “Accessibility for Electronic Resources Librarians,” Serials Librarian 71, no. 3–4 (2016): 181, https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1254134.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990).
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 355 (1973).
Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Federally Assisted Programs and Activities, 77 Fed. Reg. 14,972 (March 14, 2012) (to be codified at 34 CFR pt. 104).
DeLancey and Ostergaard, “Accessibility for Electronic Resources,” 180.
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 65 Fed. Reg. 80,500, 80,524 (December 21, 2000) (to be codified at 36 CFR pt. 1194).
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 82 Fed. Reg. 5,790 (January 19, 2017) (to be codified at 36 CFR pt. 1193-1194).
USC §794d, at 289 (2016).
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 82 Fed. Reg. 5,790, 5,791 (January 19, 2017) (to be codified at 36 CFR pt. 1193-1194).
Paul T. Jaeger, “Section 508 Goes to the Library: Complying with Federal Legal Standards to Produce Accessible Electronic and Information Technology in Libraries,” Information Technology and Disabilities 8, no. 2 (2002), http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A207644357/AONE?u=9211haea&sid=AONE&xid=4c7f77da.
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 82 Fed. Reg. 5,790, 5791 (January 19, 2017) (to be codified at 36 CFR pt. 1193-1194).
Ben Caldwell et al., eds., “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0,” last modified December 11, 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/.
DeLancey, Laura, “Assessing the Accuracy of Vendor-supplied Accessibility Documentation,” Library Hi Tech 33, no. 1 (2015): 108.
Ostergaard, Kirsten, “Accessibility from Scratch: One Library’s Journey to Prioritize the Accessibility of Electronic Information Resources,” Serials Librarian 69, no. 2 (2015): 159, https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1069777.
Jaeger, “Section 508.”
Mary Case et al., eds., “Report of the ARL Joint Task Force on Services to Patrons with Print Disabilities,” Association of Research Libraries, November 2, 2012, p. 29, http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/print-disabilities-tfreport02nov12.pdf.
DeLancey and Ostergaard, “Accessibility for Electronic Resources,” 180.
Jennifer Tatomir and Joan C. Durrance, “Overcoming the Information Gap: Measuring the Accessibility of Library Databases to Adaptive Technology Users,” Library Hi Tech 28, no. 4 (2010): 581, https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096240.
Tatomir and Durrance, “Overcoming the Information Gap,” 584.
DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy,” 104–5.
Christina Mune and Ann Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone? An Evaluation of Academic E-book Platforms’ Accessibility Features,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 28, no. 3 (2016): 172–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2016.1200927.
Mune and Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone?,” 175.
Joanne Oud, “Accessibility of Vendor-Created Database Tutorials for People with Disabilities,” Information Technology and Libraries 35, no. 4 (2016): 12, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v35i4.9469.
Mark Hachman, “Tested: How Flash Destroys Your Browser’s Performance,” PC World, August 7, 2015, https://www.pcworld.com/article/2960741/browsers/tested-how-flash-destroys-your-browsers-performance.html.
Oud, “Accessibility of Vendor-Created Database Tutorials,” 12.
DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy,” 106–7.
DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy,” 105.
Kirsten Ostergaard, “Accessibility from Scratch: One Library’s Journey to Prioritize the Accessibility of Electronic Information Resources,” Serials Librarian 69, no. 2 (2015): 162–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1069777.
Ostergaard, “Accessibility from Scratch.” 164
DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy,” 111.
Cynthia Guyer and Michelle Uzeta, “Assistive Technology Obligations for Postsecondary Education Institutions,” Journal of Access Services 6, no. 1/2 (2009): 29; Oud, “Accessibility of Vendor-Created Database Tutorials,” 7.
Mune and Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone?,” 173.
Colker, “The Americans with Disabilities Act,” 792–93.
DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy,” 107.
Colker, “The Americans with Disabilities Act,” 814; Mune and Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone?,” 182.
Adriana Cardenes to Dr. James Rosser, April 7, 1997, private collection, quoted in Colker, “The Americans with Disabilities Act is Outdated,” 815.
Sushil K. Oswal, “Access to Digital Library Databases in Higher Education: Design Problems and Infrastructural Gaps,” Work 48, no. 3 (2014): 316.
Ostergaard, “Accessibility from Scratch,” 164.
Mune and Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone?,” 175.
DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy,” 108; Mune and Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone?,” 181.
Colker, “The Americans with Disabilities Act,” 817.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Information Technology and Libraries
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.
