Navigating Uncharted Waters
Utilizing Innovative Approaches in Legacy Theses and Dissertations Digitization at the University of Houston Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v41i3.14719Keywords:
theses and dissertations digitization, project management, digitization devices and approaches, metadata automation, accessibilityAbstract
In 2019, the University of Houston Libraries formed a Theses and Dissertations Digitization Task Force charged with digitizing and making more widely accessible the University’s collection of over 19,800 legacy theses and dissertations. Supported by funding from the John P. McGovern Foundation, this initiative has proven complex and multifaceted, and one that has engaged the task force in a broad range of activities, from purchasing digitization equipment and software to designing a phased, multiyear plan to execute its charge. This plan is structured around digitization preparation (phase one), development of procedures and workflows (phase two), and promotion and communication to the project’s targeted audiences (phase three). The plan contains step-by-step actions to conduct an environmental scan, inventory the theses and dissertations collections, purchase equipment, craft policies, establish procedures and workflows, and develop digital preservation and communication strategies, allowing the task force to achieve effective planning, workflow automation, progress tracking, and procedures documentation. The innovative and creative approaches undertaken by the Theses and Dissertations Digitization Task Force demonstrated collective intelligence resulting in scaled access and dissemination of the University’s research and scholarship that helps to enhance the University’s impact and reputation.
References
Cathleen L. Martyniak, “Scanning Our Scholarship: The University of Florida Retrospective Dissertation Scanning Project,” Microform and Imaging Review 37, no. 3 (2008): 122–24, https://doi.org/10.1515/mfir.2008.013.
Dictionary of Texas Digital Library Descriptive Metadata for Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Version 2.0, (2015), http://hdl.handle.net/2249.1/68437.
Gail Clement and Melissa Levine, “Copyright and Publication Status of Pre-1978 Dissertations: A Content Analysis Approach,” portal: Libraries and the Academy 11, no. 3 (2011): 825, https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0031.
Gary M. Worley, “Dissertations Unbound: A Case Study for Revitalizing Access,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Uppsala, Sweden, 2007).
Geneva Henry, “Guide to Access Levels and Embargoes of ETDs,” in Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs, eds. Matt Schultz, Nick Krabbenhoeft, and Katherine Skinner, (2014): sect. 2, p. 1, https://educopia.org/guidance-documents-for-lifecycle-management-of-etds.
Linda Bennett and Dimity Flanagan, “Measuring the Impact of Digitized Theses: A Case Study from the London School of Economics,” Insights: The UKSG Journal 29, no. 2 (2016): 111–19, https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.300.
Mary Piorun and Lisa A. Palmer, “Digitizing Dissertations for an Institutional Repository: A Process and Cost Analysis,” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 96, no. 3 (2008): 223–29, https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.96.3.008.
Patricia Hswe, “Briefing on Copyright and Fair Use Issues in ETDs,” in Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs, eds. Matt Schultz, Nick Krabbenhoeft, and Katherine Skinner, (2014): sect. 3, p. 12, https://educopia.org/guidance-documents-for-lifecycle-management-of-etds.
“Retrospective Dissertation Scanning Policy,” (2011), University of Florida, accessed January 1, 2022, https://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00007596/00001.
Sarah L. Shreeves and Thomas H. Teper, “Looking Backwards: Asserting Control over Historic Dissertations,” College and Research Library News 73, no. 9 (2012): 532–33, https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.73.9.8830.
Todd Mundle, “Digital Retrospective Conversion of Theses and Dissertations: An In House Project,” in Proceedings of Eighth Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertation (Sydney, Australia, 2005): 3–4.
Xiaocan (Lucy) Wang, “Guidelines for Implementing ETD Programs—Roles and Responsibilities,” in Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs, eds. Matt Schultz, Nick Krabbenhoeft, and Katherine Skinner (2014): sect.1, p. 14, https://educopia.org/guidance-documents-for-lifecycle-management-of-etds.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Annie Wu, Taylor Davis-Van Atta, Bethany Scott, Santi Thompson, Anne Washington, Jerrell Jones, Andrew Weidner, A. Laura Ramirez, and Marian Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.