Redesigning Research Guides
Lessons Learned from Usability Testing at the University of Memphis
Keywords:academic libraries; user interfaces; user-centered system design; usability testing; research guides
At the University of Memphis, a team of librarians and library staff formed the Research Guides Redesign Team (RGRT) to redesign, organize, and evaluate the University Libraries’ (UL) research guides. The purpose of the project was to ensure that the new design of the research guides homepage was intuitive to use. While it is impossible to ensure absolute usability for every user, this usability study attempts to eradicate the most common interface issues in community experiences at the University of Memphis. The RGRT conducted usability testing to evaluate the effectiveness of the new standardized format, grouped headings, and the appearance of the interface. The RGRT worked within the limitations of Springshare’s software to create the design and then chose five users to complete various task scenarios. Upon analysis of the users’ ability to complete the tasks, the RGRT discovered that overall, the design was effective, but they did make a few minor changes. This study describes the process and includes the original design, the new design, edits made after usability testing was conducted, and plans for future testing.
Aaron Bowen, Jake Ellis, and Barbara Chaparro, “Long Nav or Short Nav?: Student Responses to Two Different Navigational Interface Designs in LibGuides Version 2,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44, no. 3 (2018): 391–403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.002.
Amy E. G. Barker and Ashley T. Hoffman, “Student-Centered Design: Creating LibGuides Students Can Actually Use,” College and Research Libraries 82, no. 4 (2021): 75–91, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.1.75; Danielle A. Becker and Lauren Yannotta, “Modeling a Library Website Redesign Process: Developing a User-Centered Website through Usability Testing,” Information Technology & Libraries 32, no. 1 (2013): 6–22, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v32i1.2311; Suzanna Conrad and Christy Sevens, “Am I on the Library Website?: A LibGuides Usability Study,” Information Technology & Libraries 38, no. 3 (2019): 49–81, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i3.10977; Amanda Donovan, “Building the Website of the Future In-House,” Computers in Libraries 42, no. 2 (2022): 4–8, https://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/mar22/index.shtml.
Ashley Lierman, Bethany Scott, Mea Warren, and Cherie Turner, “Testing for Transition: Evaluating the Usability of Research Guides around a Platform Migration,” Information Technology and Libraries 38, no. 4 (2019): 83, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i4.11169.
Isabel Vargas Ochoa, “Navigation Design and Library Terminology: Findings from a User-Centered Usability Study on a Library Website,” Information Technology & Libraries 39, no. 4 (2020): 12, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i4.12123.
Jakob Nielsen, “Thinking Aloud: The #1 Usability Tool,” accessed May 22, 2023, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/.
Jakob Nielsen, “Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users,” accessed May 22, 2023, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/
Jeremiah Paschke-Wood, Ellen Dubinsky, and Leslie Sult, “Creating a Student-Centered Alternative to Research Guides: Developing the Infrastructure to Support Novice Learners,” In the Library with the Lead Pipe (October 2020), https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/student-centered-alternative-research-guides/.
Jimmy Ghaphery and Erin White, “Library Use of Web-Based Research Guides,” Information Technology & Libraries 31, no. 1 (2012): 23, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i1.1830.
Jon C. Giullian and Ernest A. Zitser, “Beyond LibGuides: The Past, Present, and Future of Online Research Guides,” Slavic and East European Information Resources 16, no. 4 (2015): 170–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228886.2015.1094718.
Kimberly L. O’Neill and Brooke A. Guilfoyle, “Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign: What Does ‘Reference’ Mean to Academic Library Users?,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 4 (2015): 386–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.007.
Marieke McCloskey, “Turn User Goals into Task Scenarios for Usability Testing,” accessed May 22, 2023, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/task-scenarios-usability-testing/.
Mark Aaron Polger, “Student Preferences in Library Website Vocabulary,” Library Philosophy & Practice (2011): 1, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/618/.
Nigel Ford, “What Is Information Behaviour and Why Do We Need to Know About It?,” in Introduction to Information Behaviour (London: Facet Publishing, 2015), 14.
Olga Torres-Hostench, Joss Moorkens, Sharon O’Brien, and Joris Vreeke, “Testing Interaction with a Mobile MT Post-Editing App,” Translation & Interpreting 9, no. 2 (2017): 138–50, https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.109202.2017.a09; Jure Trilar, Tjaša Sobočan, and Emilija Stojmenova Duh, “Family-Center Design: Interactive Performance Testing and User Interface Evaluation of the Slovenian eDavki Public Tax Portal,” Sensors 21, no. 15 (2021): 5161, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21155161; Scott Uhl, “Applying User-Centered Design to Discovery Layer Evaluation in the Law Library,” Legal Reference Services Quarterly 38, no. 1/2 (2019): 30–63, https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2019.1614373.
Oliver Schulz, “Library Support for Distance Learning at Colorado Christian University,” Theological Librarianship 13, no. 2 (2020): 20–22, https://doi.org/10.31046/tl.v13i2.1938.
Peggy C. Holzweiss, Barbara Polnick, and Fred C. Lunenberg, “Online in Half the Time: A Case Study with Online Compressed Courses,” Innovative Higher Education, 44 no. 4 (2019): 299–315, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09476-8; Andrew J. Magda, David Capranos, and Carol B. Aslanian, Online College Students 2020: Comprehensive Data on Demands and Preferences (Louisville, KY: Wiley Education), https://universityservices.wiley.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/OCS2020Report-ONLINE-FINAL.pdf; Julia E. Seaman, I. Elaine Allen, and Jess Seaman, Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States (Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group, 2018), https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580852.
Primary Research Group, The Survey of Library Services for MOOCS: Blended and Distance Learning Programs, 2016 ed. (New York: Primary Research Group Inc, 2015), 24, https://digital.auraria.edu/files/pdf?fileid=149c1b4a-a35d-48f1-81d8-5f47bb757ecf
Ruth Sara Connell, Lisa C. Wallis, and David Comeaux, “The Impact of COVID-19 on the Use of Academic Library Resources,” Information Technology & Libraries 40, no. 2 (2021): 8, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12629.
Sarah Thorngate and Allison Hoden, “Exploratory Usability Testing of User Interface Options in LibGuides 2,” College & Research Libraries 78, no. 6 (2017): 846, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.844.
Simone Borsci et al., “Reviewing and Extending the Five-User Assumption: A Grounded Procedure for Interaction Evaluation,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, no. 5 (2013): 11–18, https://doi.org/10.1145/2506210.
University Libraries, “ENGL 1020: English Composition 1020,” accessed May 22, 2023, https://libguides.memphis.edu/engl1020.
University Libraries, “Research: By Course, Subject, or Topic,” accessed May 22, 2023, https://libguides.library.arizona.edu/library-guides.
Yoo Young Lee and M. Sara Lowe, “Building Positive Learning Experiences through Pedagogical Research Guide Design,” Journal of Web Librarianship 12, no. 4 (2018): 205–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1499453.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Jessica McClure, Carl Hess, David Marsicano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.