Weaving the Threads of Bibliographic Ontologies
Application of a Reference Ontology to Advance Semantic Interoperability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v44i2.17289Keywords:
reference ontology, linked dataAbstract
Bibliographic ontologies are crucial to make the most of networked library metadata, but they show interoperability limitations in the Semantic Web. Following a research study on the subject, this paper presents a possible solution to such limitations by means of a reference ontology (RO) intended to allow integration of different ontologies without imposing a common central one and to overcome limitations of mapping techniques, such as crosswalks and application profiles, most used in interconnecting bibliographic ontologies. Interoperability issues of Resource Description and Access (RDA) and Bibliographic Framework Initiative—BIBFRAME (BF) ontologies are addressed using real-world examples from the Library of Congress (LoC) and Biblioteca Nacional de España (BNE) datasets. For a proof of concept of the RO, this paper is focused on two specific interoperability problems that are not solvable with the usual data transformative techniques: misalignments concerning the definition and representation of Work and Expression classes; and the absence of formalization of properties essential to whole-part relationships, namely transitivity, nonreflexivity and asymmetry. The potential of the RO for solving such problem examples is demonstrated by making in-depth use of Resource Description Framework Schema/Web Ontology Language (RDFS/OWL) semantic reasoning and inference mechanisms, combined with Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), when restrictions are needed to impose data constraints and validation. The RO innovation consists in the formulation of an independent high-level ontology, through which the elements of different source-ontologies are interlinked without being modified or replaced, but rather preserved, and in using semantic mechanisms to generate additional elements needed to consistently describe the relationship between them.
References
Aidan Hogan et al., “An Empirical Survey of Linked Data Conformance,” Journal of Web Semantics 14, (2012): 14–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2012.02.001.
Alan Rector and Chris Welty, Simple Part-whole Relations in OWL Ontologies, W3C editor's draft, 2005, https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/.
Amanda Sprochi, “Where Are We Headed? Resource Description and Access, Bibliographic Framework, and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Library Reference Model,” International Information & Library Review 48, no. 2 (2016): 129–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176455.
American Library Association, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, RDA Alignments: Alignment from RDA Elements to IFLA LRM (2022), https://www.rdaregistry.info/Aligns/alignRDA2LRM.html.
American Library Association, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, RDA Maps: Map from RDA Classes to IFLA LRM (2022), https://www.rdaregistry.info/Maps/mapRDAEntity2LRM.html.
American Library Association, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, RDA Maps: Map from RDA Properties to IFLA LRM (2022), https://www.rdaregistry.info/Maps/mapRDA2LRM.html.
American Library Association, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, RDA Alignments: Alignment from RDA Entities to IFLA LRM (2022), https://www.rdaregistry.info/Aligns/alignRDAEntity2LRM.html.
Bernhard Haslhofer and Wolfgang Klas, “A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability,” ACM Computing Surveys 42, article no. 7 (2010): 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1145/1667062.1667064.
BIBFRAME Ontology, Library of Congress, 2016, https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe.html.
BIBFRAME Ontology, Library of Congress, https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe.html.
BIBFRAME Profiles: Introduction and Specification, Library of Congress, 2014, https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-profiles.html.
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Protégé, https://protege.stanford.edu.
Boris Motik, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Bijan Parsia, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, 2nd ed., W3C Recommendation, 11 December 2012, https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-syntax/.
Christopher S. G. Khoo and Jin-Cheon Na, “Semantic Relations in Information Science, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 40, no. 1 (2007): 157–228, https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440400112.
Dan Brickley and R. V. Guha, RDF Schema 1.1, W3C Recommendation, 25 February 2014, https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-schema/.
DATOS.BNE.ES: El Portal de Datos Bibliográficos de la Biblioteca Nacional de España, https://datos.bne.es/.
Dimitris Kontokostas et al., “Test-Driven Evaluation of Linked Data Quality,” in WWW '14—Proceedings of the 23rd international World Wide Web Conference, ed. Chin-Wan Chung et al. (ACM, 2014), 747–58, https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568002.
Erik T. Mitchell, “Building Blocks of Linked Open Data in Libraries,” Library Technology Reports 49, no. 5 (2013): 11–25, https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4692/5584.
Fernando Silva Parreiras, Steffen Staab, and Andreas Winter, “On Marrying Ontological and Metamodeling Technical Spaces,” in ESEC-FSE Companion '07: The 6th Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ACM Press, 2007), 439–48, https://doi.org/10.1145/1295014.1295017.
Fernando Silva Parreiras, Steffen Staab, and Andreas Winter, “On Marrying Ontological and Metamodeling Technical Spaces,” in ESEC-FSE Companion '07: The 6th Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ACM Press, 2007), 439–48, https://doi.org/10.1145/1295014.1295017.
Ghazai Faraj and András Micsik, “Representing and Validating Cultural Heritage Knowledge Graphs in CIDOC-CRM Ontology,” Future Internet 13, no. 11 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13110277.
Haslhofer and Klas, “A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability”.
Helena Simões Patrício, Formalização de Ontologia de Referência para Estruturação, Interligação e Validação de Dados Bibliográficos na Web Semântica (2023). PhD diss., University Institute of Lisbon, http://hdl.handle.net/10071/34243.
Helena Simões Patrício, Maria Inês Cordeiro, and Pedro Nogueira Ramos, “Formalizing Enrichment Mechanisms for Bibliographic Ontologies in the Semantic Web,” in Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2018, ed. E. Garoufallou (Springer, 2019), 147–58, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_14.
Helena Simões Patrício, Maria Inês Cordeiro, and Pedro Nogueira Ramos, “From the Web of Bibliographic Data to the Web of Bibliographic Meaning: Structuring, Interlinking, and Validating Ontologies on the Semantic Web,” International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 14, no. 2 (2020): 124–34, https://10.1504/IJMSO.2020.108318.
Holger Knublauch and Dimitris Kontokostas, Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), W3C Recommendation, 20 July 2017, https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/.
Holger Knublauch, DASH Constraint Components, unofficial draft, 14 September 2021, DASH Data Shapes, https://datashapes.org/constraints.html.
Holger Knublauch, SHACL and OWL Compared, SPIN, 2017, http://spinrdf.org/shacl-and-owl.html.
Irfan Ullah, Shah Khusro, Asim Ullah, and Muhammad Naeem, “An Overview of the Current State of Linked and Open Data in Cataloguing,” Information Technology and Libraries 37, no. 4 (2018): 47–80, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432.
James F. Brinkley et al., “A Framework for Using Reference Ontologies as a Foundation for the Semantic Web,” AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (2006): 96–100, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1839690.
John Hebeler, Matthew Fisher, Ryan Blace, and Andrew Perez-Lopez, Semantic Web Programming (Wiley, 2009).
Jos de Bruijn et al., “Ontology Mediation, Merging, and Aligning,” in Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology‐Based Systems, ed. J. Davies et al. (Wiley, 2006), http://www.dit.unitn.it/~p2p/RelatedWork/Matching/mediation-chapter.pdf.
Karen Coyle, “FRBR, Twenty Years On,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 53, no. 3-4 (2015): 265–85, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.943446.
Karen Coyle, “RDA Vocabularies for a Twenty-First-Century Data Environment,” Library Technology Reports 46, no. 2 (2010): 5–39, https://doi.org/10.5860/ltr.46n2.
Karen Coyle, Gianmaria Silvello, and Anna Maria Tammaro, “Comparing Methodologies: Linked Open Data and Digital Libraries” in AIUCD'14 - Proceedings of the Third AIUCD Annual Conference - Humanities and Their Methods in the Digital Ecosystem, ed. F. Tomasi, R. R. del Turco, and A.M. Tammaro (2014), https://doi.org/10.1145/2802612.2802615.
Karen Smith-Yoshimura, “Analysis of 2018 International Linked Data Survey for Implementers,” Code4Lib Journal 42 (2018), https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/13867.
Kevin Feeney, Rob Brennan, and Gavin Mendel-Gleason, “Linked Data Schemata: Fixing Unsound Foundations,” Semantic Web Journal 9, no. 1 (2018): 53–75, https://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/linked-data-schemata-fixing-unsound-foundations-1.
Kim Talleras, Metadata Structures of the Bibliographic Universe: Transformation. Interoperability, Conceptualizations and Quality, PhD diss., Oslo Metropolitan University, 2018, https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/bitstream/handle/10642/6622/A-18-18-manus-Taller%C3%A5s-siste.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.
Kimmy Szeto, “Positioning Library Data for the Semantic Web: Recent Developments in Resource Description,” Journal of Web Librarianship 7, no. 3 (2013): 305–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.802584.
Kristin E. Martin and Kavita Mundle, “Positioning Libraries for a New Bibliographic Universe: A Review of Cataloging and Classification Literature,” Library Resources and Technical Services 48, no. 4 (2014): 223–49, https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/5408/6637/.
Leila Zemmouchi-Ghomari and Abdessamed Reda Ghomari, “Reference Ontology,” in Fifth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems (IEE, 2009): 485–41, https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2009.81.
Leo Obrst, Ontologies & the Semantic Web for Semantic Interoperability (2019), https://slideplayer.com/slide/6904268/.
Library of Congress Catalog Instances, https://id.loc.gov/resources/instances.html.
Library of Congress Catalog Items, https://id.loc.gov/resources/items.html.
Library of Congress Catalog Works, https://id.loc.gov/resources/works.html.
Lois Mai Chan and Marcia Lei Zeng, “Metadata Interoperability and Standardization — A Study of Methodology Part I: Achieving Interoperability at the Schema Level,” D-Lib Magazine 12, no. 6 (2006), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html.
Lynne C. Howarth, “FRBR and Linked Data: Connecting FRBR and Linked Data,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50, no. 5–7 (2012): 763–76, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.680835.
Margaret St. Pierre, Sandra Paul, Albert Simmonds, and Bill La Plant, “We Used to Call it Publishing—Issues in Crosswalking Content Metadata Standards,” Against the Grain 11, no. 4 (1999), https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.3551.
Maria Hallo, Sergio Lujan-Mora, Alejandro Maté, and Juan Trujillo, “Current State of Linked Data in Digital Libraries,” Journal of Information Science 42, no. 2 (2016): 117–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515594729.
Maria Inês Cordeiro, Information Technology Frameworks in LIS: Exploring IT Constructs as Sources of Conceptual Alignment, PhD diss., University College London, 2005, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1446300/1/De%20Cordeiro_M.I.D_thesis.Redacted.pdf.
Maria Poveda Villalón, Ontology Evaluation: A Pitfall-Based Approach to Ontology Diagnosis, PhD diss., Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2016, https://oa.upm.es/39448/1/MARIA_POVEDA_VILLALON.pdf.
Matt Miller, BIBFRAME 2.0.1, 2018, https://github.com/lcnetdev/bibframe-ontology/blob/main/archive/bibframe-2.0.1.rdf.
Michael Schneider, ed., OWL 2 Web Ontology Language RDF-Based Semantics, 2nd ed., W3C Recommendation, 12 December 2012, https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics.
Mike Uschold and Michael Gruninger, “Ontologies: Principles, Methods, and Applications,” The Knowledge Engineering Review 11, no. 2 (1996): 93–136, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888900007797.
Ming Hoang Vo and Quang Hoang, “Transformation of UML Class Diagram into OWL Ontology,” Journal of Information and Telecommunication 4, no. 1 (2020): 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2019.1686681.
Mirna Willer and Gordon Dunsire, Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web (Chandos, 2013).
Natasha F. Noy, “Managing Multiple Ontologies in Protégé (and the PROMPT Tools),” presentation at Sixth International Protégé Workshop, 2003, https://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2003/Natasha_Noy_prompt.pdf.
Ontología BNE. Revision: 2.0, Biblioteca Nacional de España, 2022, https://datos.bne.es/def/index-es.html.
Panorea Gaitanou, Ioanna Andreou, Miguel-Angel Sicilia, and Emmanouel Garoufallou, “Linked Data for Libraries: Creating a Global Knowledge Space, a Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Information Science 50, no. 1 (2024): 204–44, https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221084645.
Pat Riva, Patrick Le Boeuf, and Maja Zumer, eds., Library Reference Model. A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information (IFLA, 2017), https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/123456789/40/1/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712.pdf.
R. E. Y. Haasjes, Metamodel Transformations between UML and OWL, master’s thesis, University of Twente, 2019, https://essay.utwente.nl/79481/.
RDA Steering Committee, RDA Toolkit, https://www.rdatoolkit.org.
Ronald J. Murray and Barbara B. Tillett, “Cataloging Theory in Search of Graph Theory and Other Ivory Towers,” Information Technology and Libraries 30, no. 4 (2011): 170–84, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v30i4.1868.
Sally H. McCallum, “BIBFRAME and Linked Data for Libraries,” in: Linked Data for Cultural Heritage, ed. E. Jones and M. Seikel, (ALA Core, 2016), 105–23.
Sofia Zapounidou, Michalis Sfakakis, and Christos Papatheodorou, “Representing and Integrating Bibliographic Information in the Semantic Web: A Comparison of Four Conceptual Models,” Journal of Information Science 43, no. 4 (2016): 525–53, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551516650410.
Sofia Zapounidou, Study of Library Data Models in the Semantic Web Environment, PhD diss., Ionian University, 2020, https://zenodo.org/records/4018523.
Soichi Taniguchi, “Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the Viewpoint of RDA Metadata Schema,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 55, no. 6 (2017): 387–412, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161.
Songmao Zhang and Olivier Bodenreider, “Alignment of Multiple Ontologies of Anatomy: Deriving Indirect Mappings from Direct Mappings to a Reference,” AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (2005): 864–68, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16779163/.
Thomas Baker, Karen Coyle, and Sean Petiya, “Multi-entity Models of Resource Description in the Semantic Web: A Comparison of FRBR, RDA, and BIBFRAME,” Library Hi Tech 32, no. 4 (2014): 562–82, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2014-0081.
TopQuadrant, TopBraid Composer, https://topbraidcomposer.org/html.
University of Oxford, Department of Computer Science, Data, and Knowledge Group, HermiT OWL Reasoner, http://www.hermit-reasoner.com/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Helena Patrício, Pedro Nogueira Ramos, Maria Inês Cordeiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.
