An Analysis of Revisions to OAIS and the “Designated Community” in Digital Preservation

Nathan Moles

doi:10.5860/ital.v45i1.17473

Authors

Nathan Moles Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9192-7201

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v45i1.17473

Keywords:

Digital Preservation, OAIS, Designated Community

Abstract

In digital preservation, the concept of a “Designated Community” from the Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) is used to articulate the group or groups of prospective users for whom information is preserved. Concerns have been raised about this concept and its potential implications. However, OAIS has recently undergone a major revision. This study examines the extent to which these revisions address or mitigate concerns regarding the Designated Community. Issues from the literature are grouped into three areas: the concept’s implementation, its potential misapplication, and its incompatibility with the mandates of institutions that serve broad and diverse communities. Major changes related to the Designated Community are identified and considered in relation to these issues. The analysis reveals that the revisions productively contribute to concerns in the first two areas but fail to address the third. The conclusion is that the process of revising OAIS has not drawn from insights into this topic in the literature.

References

A. E. Locher, “Characterizing Potential User Groups for Versioned Geodata,” in Service-Oriented Mapping: Changing Paradigm in Map Production and Geoinformation Management, edited by J. Döllner, M. Jobst, P. Schmitz (Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72434-8_20.

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories (Magenta Book) (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2024), https://ccsds.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/5-448e85c647331d9cbaf66c096458bdd5/2025/01//652x0m2.pdf.

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories, Magenta Book (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2011).

Christian Keitel and Jenny Mitcham, Defining the Designated Community (Digital Preservation Coalition, July 2023), http://doi.org/10.7207/twgn23-01.

Christian Keitel, “Der Einzige Kompass, Den Wir Haben: Zur Kritik Der Designated Community,” Informationswissenschaft: Theorie, Methode Und Praxis 5, no. 1 (2018): 25–37, https://web.archive.org/web/20230725152637/https://bop.unibe.ch/iw/article/view/4245.

Christopher A. Lee, “Defining Digital Preservation Work: A Case Study of the Development of the Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System” (PhD diss., University of Michigan, 2005).

Colin Webb, David Pearson, and Paul Koerben, “‘Oh, You Wanted Us to Preserve That?!’ Statements of Preservation Intent for the National Library of Australia’s Digital Collections,” D-Lib Magazine 19, nos. 1–2 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1045/january2013-webb.

D. Giaretta et al., “Representation Information for Interoperability Now and with the Future,” in 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technology (IEEE, 2005), 42–46, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGDI.2005.1612462.

David Giaretta et al., “OAIS Version 3 Updates,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (iPRES, 2019).

David Giaretta, Advanced Digital Preservation (Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011).

David Giaretta, Thinking Digital Preservation: For the Serious, Intelligent, Digital Preserver (independently published, 2022).

Devan Ray Donaldson, Ewa Zegler-Poleska, and Lynn Yarmey, “Data Managers’ Perspectives on OAIS Designated Communities and the FAIR Principles: Mediation, Tools and Conceptual Models,” Journal of Documentation 76, no. 6 (2020): 1261–77.

Elizabeth Yakel, Ixchel M. Faniel, Adam Kriesberg, and Ayoung Yoon, “Trust in Digital Repositories,” International Journal of Digital Curation 8, no. 1 (2013), https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.251.

Greg Bak, “Trusted by Whom? TDRs, Standards Culture and the Nature of Trust,” Archival Science 16 (2016): 373–402, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9257-1.

Information Preparation to Enable Long-Term Use (Magenta Book) (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2024), https://ccsds.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/5-448e85c647331d9cbaf66c096458bdd5/2025/01//653x0m1.pdf.

Isto Huvila, “Participatory Archive: Towards Decentralised Curation, Radical User Orientation, and Broader Contextualisation of Records Management,” Archival Science 8, no. 1 (2008): 15–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.

Karen S. Baker, Ruth E. Duerr, and Mark A. Parsons, “Scientific Knowledge Mobilization: Co-Evolution of Data Products and Designated Communities,” International Journal of Digital Curation 10, no. 2 (2016): 110–35, https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.346.

M. A. Parsons and R. Duerr, “Designating User Communities for Scientific Data: Challenges and Solutions,” Data Science Journal 4 (2005): 31–38, https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.4.31.

M. Mois, C. P. Klas, and M. L. Hemmje, “Digital Preservation as Communication with the Future,” in 2009 16th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (IEEE, 2009), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.2009.5201104.

Nathan Moles, “Open Government Data (OGD): Challenging the Concept of a ‘Designated Community,’” Records Management Journal 31, no. 1 (2021): 18–33, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-10-2019-0065.

Nathan Moles, “Preservation for Diverse Users: Digital Preservation and the ‘Designated Community’ at the Ontario Jewish Archives,” Journal of Documentation 78, no. 3 (2022): 613–30, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2021-0041.

nestor Working Group Preservation Planning, nestor Guideline for Preservation Planning Procedural Model and Implementation (nestor, 2014).

nestor Working Group Trusted Repositories – Certification, Explanatory Notes on the nestor Seal for Trustworthy Digital Archives (nestor, 2013).

Nick del Pozo, Andrew Stawowczyk Long, and David Pearson, “‘Land of the Lost’: A Discussion of What Can Be Preserved through Digital Preservation,” Library Hi Tech 28, no. 2 (2010): 290–300, https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047686.

Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard: Recommended Standard (Magenta Book) (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2004), https://ccsds.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/5-448e85c647331d9cbaf66c096458bdd5/2025/01//651x0m1.pdf.

Producer-Archive Interface Specification (PAIS): Recommended Standard (Blue Book) (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2014), https://ccsds.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/5-448e85c647331d9cbaf66c096458bdd5/2025/01//651x1b1.pdf.

Rathachai Chawuthai, Vilas Wuwongse, and Hideaki Takeda, “A Formal Approach to the Modelling of Digital Archives,” in The Outreach of Digital Libraries: A Globalized Resource Network, edited by Hsin-Hsi Chen and Gobinda Chowdhury (Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2012), 179–88, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34752-8_24.

Rebecca D. Frank and Laura Rothfritz, “Designated Community: Uncertainty and Risk,” Journal of Documentation 79, no. 4 (2023): 880–97, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2022-0161.

Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS): Recommended Practice (Magenta Book) (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2012), https://ccsds.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/5-448e85c647331d9cbaf66c096458bdd5/2025/01//650x0m2s.pdf.

Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS): Recommended Practice (Magenta Book) (Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2024), 1–14, https://ccsds.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/5-448e85c647331d9cbaf66c096458bdd5/2025/01//650x0m3.pdf.

Rhiannon S. Bettivia, “Encoding Power: The Scripting of Archival Structures in Digital Spaces Using the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model” (PhD diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016).

Rhiannon S. Bettivia, “The Power of Imaginary Users: Designated Communities in the OAIS Reference Model,” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 53, no. 1 (2016): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301038.

Ruth Duerr et al., “Challenges in Long-Term Data Stewardship,” in MSST, 2004, 47–67, https://msstconference.org/MSST-history/2004/Papers/05-Duerr-a.pdf.

Sabine Schrimpf and Christian Keitel, “nestor Guideline for Preservation Planning—A Process Model,” LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 23, no. 3 (2014): 201–13, https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9166.

Seamus Ross, “Approaching Digital Preservation Holistically,” in Information Management and Preservation, edited by Alistair Tough and Michael Moss (Oxford, UK: Chandos Press, 2006), 115–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-142-0.50006-2.

Stephen Abrams, “Tacit Attitudinal Principles for Evaluating Digital Preservation Success,” Archival Science 21, no. 3 (2021): 295–315, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-021-09360-5.

Tarvo Kärberg, “Digital Preservation and Knowledge in the Public Archives: For Whom?,” Archives and Records 35 (2014): 126–43.

Yunhyong Kim, “‘Designated Communities’: Through the Lens of the Web,” International Journal of Digital Curation 10, no. 1 (2015): 184-195, https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.360.

An Analysis of Revisions to OAIS and the “Designated Community” in Digital Preservation

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Developed By

Information