Relationality Over Neutrality
On Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v44i4.17581Keywords:
critical librarianship, critical information literacy, technology studies, cultural studies, information theoryAbstract
Bridging the disciplinary gaps between library and information science and communication/cultural studies, this column utilizes LIS's interest in generative AI to frame a critical discussion regarding neutrality towards technology within librarianship.
References
Adam Nemeroff, “What is AI Slop? A Technologist Explains This New and Largely Unwelcome Form of Online Content,” The Conversation, September 2, 2025, https://theconversation.com/what-is-ai-slop-a-technologist-explains-this-new-and-largely-unwelcome-form-of-online-content-256554.
Alex Brown, “Libraries Must Stop Pretending They Can Be Neutral about Human Rights,” Prism Reports, July 21, 2022, https://prismreports.org/2022/7/21/libraries-cannot-be-neutral-human-rights/.
Anastasia Chiu, Fobazi M. Ettarh, and Jennifer A. Ferretti, “Not the Shark, but the Water: How Neutrality and Vocational Awe Intertwine to Uphold White Supremacy,” Knowledge Justice: Disrupting Library and Information Studies through Critical Race Theory, eds. Sofia Y. Leung and Jorge R. López-McKnight (MIT Press, 2021), 49–71.
Aníbal Quijano, “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality,” Cultural Studies 21, no. 2–3 (2007): 168–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.
Bernard Stiegler, Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus (Stanford University Press, 1998).
Bryan Norton, “Our Tools Shape Our Selves,” Aeon. April 1, 2024, https://aeon.co/essays/bernard-stieglers-philosophy-on-how-technology-shapes-our-world.
Cara New Daggett, The Birth of Energy: Fossil Fuels, Thermodynamics, and the Politics of Work (Duke University Press, 2019).
Chris Gilliard “Challenging Tech's Imagined Future,” Just Tech. Social Science Research Council, March 2, 2023, https://just-tech.ssrc.org/articles/challenging-techs-imagined-future/.
Ciaran B. Trace, “What is Recorded is Never Simply ‘What Happened’: Record Keeping in Modern Organizational Culture,” Archival Science 2, no. 1 (2002): 137–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435634.
Daniella L. Smith et al., “Public Librarian Job Stressors and Burnout Predictors,” Journal of Library Administration 60 no 4 (2020): 412–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1733347.
Emily Bender and Alex Hanna, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want (HarperCollins, 2025).
Emily Drabinski and Eamon Tewell, “Critical Information Literacy,” The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy, eds. Renee Hobbs and Paul Mihailidis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2019): 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0042.
Emily Drabinski,“Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction,” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 83, no. 2 (2013): 94–111, https://doi.org/10.1086/669547, 101.
Erica Jesonis, “Running the Library Race,” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, September 19, 2012, https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/running-the-library-race/.
Fabian Offert and Thao Phan, “A Sign that Spells: Machinic Concepts and the Racial Politics of Generative AI,” Journal of Digital Social Research 6, no. 4 2024): 49–59, https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i440462.
Fobazi Ettarh, “Vocational Awe and Librarianship: The Lies We Tell Ourselves,” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, January 10, 2018, https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2018/vocational-awe/.
Gina Schlesselman-Tarango, Topographies of Whiteness: Mapping Whiteness in Library and Information Science (Library Juice Press: 2017).
Greg Downey, “Making Media Work: Time, Space, Identity and Labor in the Analysis of Information and Communication Infrastructures,” Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, eds. Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten Foot (MIT Press, 2014), 148.
Hugh Rundle, “What We Talk About When We Talk About Public Libraries,” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, October 23, 2013, https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-public-libraries/.
James Muldoon and Boxi A. Wu, “Artificial Intelligence in the Colonial Matrix of Power,” Philosophy & Technology 36, no. 80 (2023): 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00687-8.
Jason Koebler, “AI Slop Is a Brute Force Attack on the Algorithms That Control Reality,” 404 Media, March 17, 2025, https://www.404media.co/ai-slop-is-a-brute-force-attack-on-the-algorithms-that-control-reality/.
Jiménez Sierra et al., “Development of the Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A Systematic Review,” Frontiers in Education 8 (2023): 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913.
Joanne Rodger et al., “The Emotional Labour of Public Library Work,” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 16 (2021): 1–27, https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6189.
José María Díaz-Nafría, “What is Information? A Multidimensional Concern,” tripleC 8, no. 1 (2010): 77–108, https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v8i1.76.
Julie Rose, Free Time (Princeton University Press, 2016).
Kailyn Slater, “Against AI: Critical Refusal in the Library,” Library Trends 73 no. 4 (2025): 588–608, https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968497.
Kelsey Smith, “How to Love Your Job and Yourself When Your Job Isn’t Loving You Back: Strategies for Difficult Times From a Public Library Staff Perspective,” Alki: The Washington Library Association Journal 35 (2019): 16–18, https://alki.pubpub.org/35-3.
Kristen C. Howard, “Digitization and Exploitation: Acknowledging and Addressing the Use of Exploitative Prison Labor by Libraries and Archives,” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 93, no 3 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1086/725070.
Langdon Winner, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109, no. 1 (1980) Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity?, 121–36.
Leo Kim, “Editor’s Note: Ends & Beginnings,” Empty Set, October 21, 2025, https://www.emptysetmag.com/articles/editor-note-issue-1.
Lorella Viola, “The Humanities in the Digital,” in The Humanities in the Digital: Beyond Critical Digital Humanities (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023), 6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16950-2_1.
Louise Amoore, Alexander Campolo, Benjamin Jacobsen, and Ludovico Rella, “A World Model: On the Political Logics of Generative AI,” Political Geography 113 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103134.
Lucy Suchman, “The Uncontroversial ‘Thingness’ of AI,” Big Data & Society 10, no. 2 (2023): 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231206794.
Maggie Harrison Dupré, “Law Firms Caught and Punished for Passing Around ‘Bogus’ AI Slop in Court,” Futurism. May 15, 2025, https://futurism.com/law-firms-fine-ai-slop-court.
Matthew Kirschenbaum, “The US of AI,” public draft, February 25, 2025, https://cdh.princeton.edu/events/matthew-kirschenbaum/.
McKenzie Wark, Virtual Geography: Living with Global Media Events (Indiana University Press, 1994).
Michelle P. Salyers et al., “Predictors of Burnout in Public Library Employees,” Journal of Librarianship & Information Science 51, no 4 (2019): 974–83, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618759415.
Milagros Miceli et al., “Methodological Considerations for Centering Workers’ Epistemic Authority in AI Research,” Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society 8, no. 2 (2025): 1698-1710, https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i2.36667.
“On Institutional Neutrality,” American Association of University Professors, February 2025, https://aaup.org/reports-publications/aaup-policies-reports/policy-statements/institutional-neutrality.
Phil Torres, “Who Would Destroy the World? Omnicidal Agents and Related Phenomena,” Aggression and Violent Behavior 39 (2018): 129–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.002.
Rosey A. Crow, “Libraries Are Not Neutral: A Pocket Sized Guide to Libraries and Their Colonial Legacy,” Poster session presented at LILAC, Cambridge, United Kingdom, https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/libraries-are-not-neutral-a-pocket-sized-guide-to-libraries-and-t/.
Ruha Benjamin, Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life (Duke University Press, 2019).
Ruha Benjamin, Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, (Polity, 2019).
Sarah Lamdan, Data Cartels: The Companies that Control and Monopolize Our Information (Stanford University Press, 2023).
Stuart Hall, “Culture, the Media, and the ‘Ideological Effect,’” Mass Communication and Society, eds. James Curran, Michael Gurevitch, and Janet Woollacott (Edward Arnold, 1977), 315–48.
Stuart Hall, “The Whites of Their Eyes: Racist Ideologies and the Media,” 1981, Stuart Hall: Selected Writings on Race and Difference, eds. Paul Gilroy and Ruth Wilson Gilmore (Duke University Press, 2021): 81, https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478021223.
Sun-ha Hong, Technologies of Speculation: The Limits of Knowledge in a Data-driven Society, (New York University Press, 2020).
Terry Cook, “What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift,” Archivaria 43 (1997): 17–63.
Timnit Gebru and Émilie P. Torres, “The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the Promise of Utopia through Artificial General Intelligence,” First Monday 29, no. 4 (2024): https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i4.13636.
Tonia Sutherland, Resurrecting the Black Body: Race and the Digital Afterlife (University of California Press, 2023), 149.
Tyson Macaulay, “The Danger of Critical Infrastructure Interdependency,” Governing Cyberspace during a Crisis in Trust: An Essay Series on the Economic Potential — and Vulnerability — of Transformative Technologies and Cyber Security (Centre for International Governance, 2019) https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26129.16.
Vina Begay and Kelley M. Klor, “Provenance through Storytelling: Applications of Indigenous Relationality toward Arrangement and Description.” Archival Science 24 no. 4 (2024): 611–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-024-09451-z.
Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Push the Poor (St. Martin’s Press, 2018).
William Liang, “Artificial Intelligence Isn’t Ruining Education; It’s Exposing What’s Already Broken,” EdSource, June 2, 2025, https://edsource.org/2025/artificial-intelligence-isnt-ruining-education-its-exposing-whats-already-broken/733854.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kailyn Slater
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.
