Artificial Research Intelligence
Autonomously AI-Generated Science and the Implications for Research Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v45i3.17706Keywords:
artificial intelligence, academic libraries, research enterprise, scientific method, academic librarianship, research librariesAbstract
This paper explores the emergence of artificial research intelligence (ARI), autonomous AI systems designed to conduct end-to-end scientific research, from ideation to manuscript production. Unlike simple AI enhancements, ARI utilizes ensembles of agentic models to automate the scientific method, potentially creating a “fifth scientific research paradigm.” While ARI offers rapid, low-cost discovery, it faces significant challenges including “epistemic capture,” where knowledge production shifts from public universities to private AI corporations. Technically, these systems currently struggle with hallucinations, a lack of deep domain expertise, and a tendency to overclaim results. However, the growing number of ARI frameworks points to an emerging research methodology of transformational possibilities. For research libraries, ARI necessitates a profound shift from managing static collections to stewarding dynamic, AI-driven knowledge systems. Libraries can lead by reimagining processes and services supporting scholarly communications, enhancing AI competencies, and conducting applied research through library-based AI labs. The combination of advanced compute and the guiding framework of the scientific method makes ARI a human–AI co-creation model where AI performs the "reckoning" (computation) and humans provide the "judgment" (ethical and intellectual oversight).
References
A. J. Dellinger, “Sam Altman Says Intelligence Will Be a Utility, and He’s Just the Man to Collect the Bills,” Gizmodo, March 12, 2026, https://gizmodo.com/sam-altman-says-intelligence-will-be-a-utility-and-hes-just-the-man-to-collect-the-bills-2000732953.
Abecassis et al., A Blueprint for Multinational Advanced AI Development.
Abigail Potter, “Introducing the LC Labs Artificial Intelligence Planning Framework,” The Signal, November 15, 2023, https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2023/11/introducing-the-lc-labs-artificial-intelligence-planning-framework.
Adrien Abecassis et al., A Blueprint for Multinational Advanced AI Development (Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, 2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17625842.
Advanced Research and Invention Agency, AI Scientist Call: Call for Research Proposals for Working with AI Scientist Systems (Middlesex, UK: ARIA, 2025), 2, https://www.aria.org.uk/media/b0jnlebb/ai-scientist-solicitation-call-document.pdf.
Agents4Science, “Agents4Science 2025 Virtual Conference,” October 22, 2025, YouTube, 03:19:22, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pXqAeedqOo.
AI Competencies for Academic Library Workers (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2025), https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/2025-10/acrl_ai_competencies.pdf.
Andrea Gasparini and Heli Kautonen, “Understanding Artificial Intelligence in Research Libraries: An Extensive Literature Review,” LIBER Quarterly 32, no. 1 (2022): 1–36, https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.10934.
Andrew Cox and Mike Thelwall, AI for Knowledge (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2025), 46, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003545163.
Andrew Cox, “How Artificial Intelligence Might Change Academic Library Work: Applying the Competencies Literature and the Theory of the Professions,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 74, no. 3 (2023): 367–80, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635.
Andrew W. Senior et al., “Improved Protein Structure Prediction Using Potentials from Deep Learning,” Nature (London) 577, no. 7792 (2020): 706–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7.
Andy Zhou et al., Zochi Technical Report (San Francisco: Intology, 2025), 3, https://github.com/IntologyAI/Zochi/blob/main/Zochi_Technical_Report.pdf.
ARL/CNI 2035 Scenarios: AI-Influenced Futures (Washington, DC and West Chester, PA: Association of Research Libraries, Coalition for Networked Information, and Stratus Inc., 2024), https://www.arl.org/resources/the-arl-cni-2035-scenarios-ai-influenced-futures-in-the-research-environment/.
Bernhard Sabel and Dan Larhammar, “Reformation of Science Publishing: The Stockholm Declaration,” Royal Society Open Science (England) 12, no. 11 (2025): 4, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251805.
Bernhard Sabel et al., “Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-Flagging Method Indicates Mass Production,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 399, no. 2 (2026): 2943–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-04275-9.
Brian Cantwell Smith, The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019).
Brian Mathews, “A Cambrian Moment for Libraries: Shaping Futures through Evolution and Leadership,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 25, no. 2 (2025): 231–50, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/955944.
Carlos Chaccour et al., “Robot Pen Pals: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Recent Trends in Scientific Correspondence,” preprint, Research Square, November 3, 2025, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992675/v1.
Catherine Coleman and Michael A. Keller, “AI in the Research Library Environment,” in Artificial Intelligence in Libraries and Publishing, edited by Pickering Ruth and Matthew Ismail (London: ATG Media, 2022), 31, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12669942.
Chris Bourg, “What Happens to Libraries and Librarians When Machines Can Read All the Books?,” Feral Librarian (blog), March 17, 2017, https://chrisbourg.wordpress.com/2017/03/16/what-happens-to-libraries-and-librarians-when-machines-can-read-all-the-books/.
Chris Lu et al., “The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery,” preprint, arXiv, August 12, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06292.
Dhruv Trehan and Paras Chopra, “Why LLMs Aren’t Scientists Yet: Lessons from Four Autonomous Research Attempts,” preprint, arXiv, January 6, 2026, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03315.
Donald J. Trump, “Executive Order 14363, Launching the Genesis Mission,” Federal Register, November 24, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/28/2025-21665/launching-the-genesis-mission.
Elsevier, Researcher of the Future (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2025), 5, https://www.elsevier.com/insights/confidence-in-research/researcher-of-the-future.
Ethan J. Gantana et al., “An In-Depth Analysis of AI-Generated Scientific Review Articles and Its Potential Implications on the Future of Medical Journal Publications,” Next Research 2, no. 4 (2025): 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.101002.
Fangmin Wang et al., “Incubating AI: The Collaboratory at Ryerson University Library,” in The Rise of AI: Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries, edited by Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2022).
Federico Bianchi et al., “Exploring the Use of AI Authors and Reviewers at Agents4Science,” Nature Biotechnology 44 (2026): 12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02963-8.
Gasparini and Kautonen, “Understanding Artificial Intelligence in Research Libraries”.
Graphite, “More Articles Are Now Created by AI Than Humans,” October 2025, https://graphite.io/five-percent/more-articles-are-now-created-by-ai-than-humans.
Guojie Li, “AI4R: The Fifth Scientific Research Paradigm,” Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 39, no. 1 (2024), https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol39/iss1/1/.
Gwern Branwen, “LLM Daydreaming,” Gwern.Net, July 14, 2025, https://gwern.net/ai-daydreaming.
Hanchen Wang et al., “Scientific Discovery in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” Nature 620, no. 7972 (2023): 57, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2.
Haoyang Su et al., “Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by a LLM-Based Multi-Agent System,” paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vienna, Austria, July 27–August 1, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.09403.
Harrison Dekker et al., “URI Libraries’ AI Lab—Evolving to Meet the Needs of Students and Research Communities,” in The Rise of AI: Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries, edited by Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2022).
Hong Zhou, “Reimagining Scholarly Publishing Workflow: A High-Level Map of What Changes Next,” The Scholarly Kitchen, November 20, 2025, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/11/20/reimagining-scholarly-publishing-workflow-a-high-level-map-of-what-changes-next/.
James Lee and Xuemao Wang, “Libraries as Research Engines: AI Agents for Discovery through Language, Inference, and Network Structure,” paper presented at the Fantastic Futures Conference, London, United Kingdom, December 3–5, 2025, https://www.conftool.org/fantastic-futures-2025/index.php?page=browseSessions&form_session=6.
Jason Griffey, “Predictions about Future Technology in Libraries and Epistemic Collapse: Laws and Mindsets,” in Library 2035: Imaging the Next Generation of Libraries, edited by Sandra Hirsh (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2024), 15.
Jean-Christophe Plantin and Andrea Thomer, “Platforms, Programmability, and Precarity: The Platformization of Research Repositories in Academic Libraries,” New Media & Society 27, no. 1 (2025): 338, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231176758.
Jennifer Listgarten, “The Perpetual Motion Machine of AI-Generated Data and the Distraction of ChatGPT as a ‘Scientist,’” Nature Biotechnology 42, no. 3 (2024): 371–73, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02103-0.
Jiaqi Wei et al., “From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery,” preprint, arXiv, August 18, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14111.
Joe Castaldo, “Anthropic’s Release of AI Tools for Lawyers Prompts Massive Legal-Tech Sell-Off,” The Globe and Mail, February 3, 2026, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-anthropics-release-of-ai-tools-for-lawyers-prompts-massive-sell-off/.
Joeran Beel et al., “Evaluating Sakana’s AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?,” SIGIR Forum 59, no. 1 (2025): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1145/3769733.376974.
John Wihbey, “AI and Epistemic Risk for Democracy: A Coming Crisis of Public Knowledge?,” SSRN Scholarly Paper (Amsterdam: Social Science Research Network, 2024), 2, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4805026.
Jonathan Woahn, “AI Isn’t Going to Pay for Content … Part Two: The Path Forward,” The Scholarly Kitchen, January 29, 2026, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/01/29/guest-post-ai-isnt-going-to-pay-for-content-part-two-the-path-forward/.
Juraj Gottweis et al., “Towards an AI Co-Scientist,” preprint, arXiv, February 26, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18864.
Jutta Haider et al., “GPT-Fabricated Scientific Papers on Google Scholar: Key Features, Spread, and Implications for Preempting Evidence Manipulation,” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 5 (2024): 1–5, https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-156.
Kailyn Slater, “Against AI: Critical Refusal in the Library,” Library Trends 73, no. 4 (2025): 588–608, https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968497.
Karen Estlund and Cynthia Hudson Vitale, Strategic Implications of AI Futures for Research Libraries: Workshop Report (Chicago: Association of Research Libraries and Coalition for Networked Information, 2026), 24, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29242/report.futurescape2026.
Kari D. Weaver, “Artificial Intelligence and Transparency: Toward a Framework for Disclosure of AI Use in Learning, Research, and Publication,” Information Services and Use 46, nos. 1–2 (2026): 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1177/18758789261435716.
Kat Boboris, “Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category,” arXiv (blog), October 31, 2025, https://blog.arxiv.org/2025/10/31/attention-authors-updated-practice-for-review-articles-and-position-papers-in-arxiv-cs-category/?ref=404media.co.
Kate Murray and Joshua Sternfeld, Content Authenticity and Provenance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Call-to-Action for the LAMs Community (C2PA for G+LAM Community of Practice, 2026), 4, https://tinyurl.com/bdej7rd9.
Katherine Skinner et al., The State of Open Research Software Infrastructure (Invest in Open Infrastructure, 2025), 3, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14888589.
Kevin Baker, “Context Widows,” Artificial Bureaucracy (Substack), December 12, 2025, https://artificialbureaucracy.substack.com/p/context-widows.
Kunlun Zhu et al., “SafeScientist: Toward Risk-Aware Scientific Discoveries by LLM Agents,” preprint, arXiv, May 29, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.23559.
Kyle Wiggers, “Academics Accuse AI Startups of Co-Opting Peer Review for Publicity,” TechCrunch, March 19, 2025, https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/19/academics-accuse-ai-startups-of-co-opting-peer-review-for-publicity/.
Lai Ma, “The Platformisation of Scholarly Information and How to Fight It,” LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 33, no. 1 (2023): 2, https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.13561.
Lateef Ayinde et al., “Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Review of Current Practices, Challenges, and Research Opportunities,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 52, no. 1 (2026): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103185.
Leo S. Lo, “AI Literacy: A Guide for Academic Libraries,” College & Research Libraries News 86, no. 3 (2025): 120–22, https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.86.3.120.
Leo S. Lo, “Evaluating AI Literacy in Academic Libraries: A Survey Study with a Focus on U.S. Employees,” College & Research Libraries 85, no. 5 (2024): 649, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.5.635.
Leo S. Lo, “The CARE Approach for Academic Librarians: From Search First to Answer First with Generative AI,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 52, no. 1 (2026): 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103186.
Lisa Messeri and M. J. Crockett, “Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research,” Nature (London) 627, no. 8002 (2024): 49–58, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.
Lorcan Dempsey, “Generative AI and Libraries: 7 Contexts,” LorcanDempsey.Net, November 12, 2023, https://www.lorcandempsey.net/generative-ai-and-libraries-7-contexts/.
Lorcan Dempsey, “Generative AI, Scholarly and Cultural Language Models, and the Return of Content,” LorcanDempsey.Net, June 28, 2023, https://www.lorcandempsey.net/generative-ai-a-note-about-content/.
Love Börjeson et al., “Transfiguring the Library as Digital Research Infrastructure: Making KBLab at the National Library of Sweden,” College & Research Libraries 85, no. 4 (2024): 578, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.4.564.
M. Mahey et al., Open a GLAM Lab: Digital Cultural Heritage Innovation Labs (Doha, Qatar: Book Sprint, 2019), https://assets.pubpub.org/4kaopqbk/31574367506714.pdf.
Maksim E. Eren and Dorianis M. Perez, “Rethinking Science in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” preprint, arXiv, November 13, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.10524.
Manuel Alejandro Cruz-Aguilar, “The Epistemic Revolution of AI: Reconfiguring the Foundations of Scientific Knowledge,” AI & Society 41, no. 1 (2025): 14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02658-3.
Maria Couto Teixeira et al., “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research Methods: Between Hype and Risks?,” paper presented at the International Workshop on Chatbots and Human-Centred AI, Lübeck, Germany, November 12–13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08461v1.
Mark Daley, “Bartleby, the PI,” Noetic Engines (Substack), November 24, 2025, https://noeticengines.substack.com/p/bartleby-the-pi.
Mark Daley, “Rethinking the Role of Higher Education in an AI-Integrated World,” University Affairs, February 6, 2026, https://universityaffairs.ca/opinion/rethinking-the-role-of-higher-education-in-an-ai-integrated-world/.
Martin Frické, Artificial Intelligence and Librarianship: Notes for Teaching, 3rd ed. (Wanaka, NZ: SoftOption, 2024), https://softoption.us/sites/default/files/AIinLibrariesNotesForTeaching.pdf.
Masud Khokhar, “Imagining the Future Library,” Katina, October 30, 2025, 1, https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/future-of-work/2025/imagining-the-future-library.
Melanie Hibbert et al., “A Framework for AI Literacy,” EDUCAUSE Review: Emerging Technologies and Trends, June 3, 2024, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/a-framework-for-ai-literacy.
Michael Ridley and Danica Pawlick-Potts, “Algorithmic Literacy and the Role for Libraries,” Information Technology and Libraries 40, no. 2 (2021): 4, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963.
Mourad Gridach et al., “Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions,” arXiv, preprint, March 12, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08979.
Mrinank Sharma et al., “Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models,” preprint, arXiv, October 20, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548.
Nuno Sousa, “Ethical and Practical Implications of AI in Academic Library Research,” IFLA Journal, ahead of print, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251391753.
Oliver Hsu, “Autonomous Labs Accelerate Scientific Discovery,” A16z News, December 10, 2025, https://www.a16z.news/i/181164050/oliver-hsu-autonomous-labs-accelerate-scientific-discovery.
Olivia Guest et al., “Against the Uncritical Adoption of ‘AI’ Technologies in Academia,” preprint, PhilArchive, 2025, https://philarchive.org/archive/GUEATU.
“Previewing Locus,” Intology (blog), November 19, 2025, https://www.intology.ai/blog/previewing-locus.
Qiguang Chen et al., “AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research,” preprint, arXiv, July 2, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.01903.
Ramón Alvarado, “AI as an Epistemic Technology,” Science and Engineering Ethics 29, no. 5 (2023): 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00451-3.
Richard Watermeyer et al., “Generative AI and the Automating of Academia,” Postdigital Science and Education (Cham) 6, no. 2 (2024): 461, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00440-6.
Ryan Cordell, Machine Learning + Libraries: A Report on the State of the Field (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2020), 41, https://labs.loc.gov/static/labs/work/reports/Cordell-LOC-ML-report.pdf.
Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley, Building an AI Literacy Framework: Perspectives from Instruction Librarians and Currently Information Literacy Tools (Chicago: American Library Association, 2024), https://www.choice360.org/research/white-paper-building-an-ai-literacy-framework-perspectives-from-instruction-librarians-and-current-information-literacy-tools/.
Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley, eds., The Rise of AI: Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2022).
Sarah G. Park, “AI and Systematic Reviews: Can AI Tools Replace Librarians in the Systematic Search Process?,” Science & Technology Libraries 45, no. 2 (2025): 21, https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2025.2521519.
Shuo Ren et al., “Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-Based Scientific Agents,” version 3, preprint, arXiv, February 2, 2026, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.24047.
Shyam Sharma, “Universities and AI: Rebuilding the Commons,” The RhetAI Coalition (Substack), January 16, 2026, https://rhetaicoalition.substack.com/p/universities-and-ai-rebuilding-the.
Simon Chesterman and Loy Hui Chieh, “Research Integrity and Academic Authority in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Curation?,” preprint, arXiv, January 9, 2026, 3, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.05574.
Tanisha Jowsey et al., “We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research,” SSRN Scholarly Paper (Amsterdam: Social Science Research Network, 2025), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5676462.
The Royal Society, Science in the Age of AI: How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing the Nature and Method of Scientific Research (London, UK: The Royal Society, 2024), 5, https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/science-in-the-age-of-ai/science-in-the-age-of-ai-report.pdf.
Tracy Bergstrom and Dylan Ruediger, A Third Transformation? Generative AI and Scholarly Publishing New York: ITHAKA S+R, 2024) https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.321519.
Tracy Bergstrom et al., The Second Digital Transformation of Scholarly Publishing: Strategic Context and Shared Infrastructure (New York: ITHAKA S+R, 2024), 22, doi.org/10.18665/sr.320210.
Ulkar Aghayeva, “Looking for Hidden Gems in Scientific Literature: The Promise and Practice of Literature-Based Discovery,” Elicit, October 20, 2025, https://elicit.com/blog/literature-based-discovery.
Veronica Showers et al., “AI Readiness and the New Value Equation in Scholarly Publishing,” The Scholarly Kitchen, February 24, 2026, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/02/24/guest-post-ai-readiness-and-the-new-value-equation-in-scholarly-publishing/.
Violet Fox, “AI Refusal in Libraries: A Starter Guide,” ACRLog (blog), June 11, 2025, https://acrlog.org/2025/06/11/ai-refusal-in-libraries-a-starter-guide/.
Wang et al., “Scientific Discovery in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.”
Will Douglas Heaven, “OpenAI Is Throwing Everything into Building a Fully Automated Researcher,” MIT Technology Review, March 20, 2026, https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/03/20/1134438/openai-is-throwing-everything-into-building-a-fully-automated-researcher/.
Woahn, “AI Isn’t Going to Pay for Content.”
Xiaoxu Ling and Siyuan Yan, “Understanding Algorithmic Aversion: A Bold Rejection of Digital Dominion,” Communications of the ACM 69, no. 3 (2026): 28, https://doi.org/10.1145/3758088.
Yoshua Bengio et al., “Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?,” preprint, arXiv, February 21, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15657.
Yu Zhu et al., “How Does Information Resource Value of AI-Generated Content Emerge? An Exploratory Study from the User Evaluation Perspective,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 77, no. 5 (2026): 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70061.
Yutaro Yamada et al., “The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search,” preprint, arXiv, April 10, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08066.
Yves Gendron et al., “The Perils of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Publishing,” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 87 (2022): 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102411.
“Zochi Publishes A* Paper,” Intology (blog), May 27, 2025, https://www.intology.ai/blog/zochi-acl.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Ridley

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.