Artificial Research Intelligence

Autonomously AI-Generated Science and the Implications for Research Libraries

Authors

  • Michael Ridley University of Guelph

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v45i3.17706

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, academic libraries, research enterprise, scientific method, academic librarianship, research libraries

Abstract

This paper explores the emergence of artificial research intelligence (ARI), autonomous AI systems designed to conduct end-to-end scientific research, from ideation to manuscript production. Unlike simple AI enhancements, ARI utilizes ensembles of agentic models to automate the scientific method, potentially creating a “fifth scientific research paradigm.” While ARI offers rapid, low-cost discovery, it faces significant challenges including “epistemic capture,” where knowledge production shifts from public universities to private AI corporations. Technically, these systems currently struggle with hallucinations, a lack of deep domain expertise, and a tendency to overclaim results. However, the growing number of ARI frameworks points to an emerging research methodology of transformational possibilities. For research libraries, ARI necessitates a profound shift from managing static collections to stewarding dynamic, AI-driven knowledge systems. Libraries can lead by reimagining processes and services supporting scholarly communications, enhancing AI competencies, and conducting applied research through library-based AI labs. The combination of advanced compute and the guiding framework of the scientific method makes ARI a human–AI co-creation model where AI performs the "reckoning" (computation) and humans provide the "judgment" (ethical and intellectual oversight).

Author Biography

Michael Ridley, University of Guelph

Librarian, McLaughlin Library

References

A. J. Dellinger, “Sam Altman Says Intelligence Will Be a Utility, and He’s Just the Man to Collect the Bills,” Gizmodo, March 12, 2026, https://gizmodo.com/sam-altman-says-intelligence-will-be-a-utility-and-hes-just-the-man-to-collect-the-bills-2000732953.

Abecassis et al., A Blueprint for Multinational Advanced AI Development.

Abigail Potter, “Introducing the LC Labs Artificial Intelligence Planning Framework,” The Signal, November 15, 2023, https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2023/11/introducing-the-lc-labs-artificial-intelligence-planning-framework.

Adrien Abecassis et al., A Blueprint for Multinational Advanced AI Development (Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, 2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17625842.

Advanced Research and Invention Agency, AI Scientist Call: Call for Research Proposals for Working with AI Scientist Systems (Middlesex, UK: ARIA, 2025), 2, https://www.aria.org.uk/media/b0jnlebb/ai-scientist-solicitation-call-document.pdf.

Agents4Science, “Agents4Science 2025 Virtual Conference,” October 22, 2025, YouTube, 03:19:22, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pXqAeedqOo.

AI Competencies for Academic Library Workers (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2025), https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/2025-10/acrl_ai_competencies.pdf.

Andrea Gasparini and Heli Kautonen, “Understanding Artificial Intelligence in Research Libraries: An Extensive Literature Review,” LIBER Quarterly 32, no. 1 (2022): 1–36, https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.10934.

Andrew Cox and Mike Thelwall, AI for Knowledge (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2025), 46, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003545163.

Andrew Cox, “How Artificial Intelligence Might Change Academic Library Work: Applying the Competencies Literature and the Theory of the Professions,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 74, no. 3 (2023): 367–80, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635.

Andrew W. Senior et al., “Improved Protein Structure Prediction Using Potentials from Deep Learning,” Nature (London) 577, no. 7792 (2020): 706–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7.

Andy Zhou et al., Zochi Technical Report (San Francisco: Intology, 2025), 3, https://github.com/IntologyAI/Zochi/blob/main/Zochi_Technical_Report.pdf.

ARL/CNI 2035 Scenarios: AI-Influenced Futures (Washington, DC and West Chester, PA: Association of Research Libraries, Coalition for Networked Information, and Stratus Inc., 2024), https://www.arl.org/resources/the-arl-cni-2035-scenarios-ai-influenced-futures-in-the-research-environment/.

Bernhard Sabel and Dan Larhammar, “Reformation of Science Publishing: The Stockholm Declaration,” Royal Society Open Science (England) 12, no. 11 (2025): 4, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251805.

Bernhard Sabel et al., “Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-Flagging Method Indicates Mass Production,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 399, no. 2 (2026): 2943–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-04275-9.

Brian Cantwell Smith, The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019).

Brian Mathews, “A Cambrian Moment for Libraries: Shaping Futures through Evolution and Leadership,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 25, no. 2 (2025): 231–50, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/955944.

Carlos Chaccour et al., “Robot Pen Pals: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Recent Trends in Scientific Correspondence,” preprint, Research Square, November 3, 2025, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7992675/v1.

Catherine Coleman and Michael A. Keller, “AI in the Research Library Environment,” in Artificial Intelligence in Libraries and Publishing, edited by Pickering Ruth and Matthew Ismail (London: ATG Media, 2022), 31, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12669942.

Chris Bourg, “What Happens to Libraries and Librarians When Machines Can Read All the Books?,” Feral Librarian (blog), March 17, 2017, https://chrisbourg.wordpress.com/2017/03/16/what-happens-to-libraries-and-librarians-when-machines-can-read-all-the-books/.

Chris Lu et al., “The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery,” preprint, arXiv, August 12, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06292.

Dhruv Trehan and Paras Chopra, “Why LLMs Aren’t Scientists Yet: Lessons from Four Autonomous Research Attempts,” preprint, arXiv, January 6, 2026, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03315.

Donald J. Trump, “Executive Order 14363, Launching the Genesis Mission,” Federal Register, November 24, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/28/2025-21665/launching-the-genesis-mission.

Elsevier, Researcher of the Future (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2025), 5, https://www.elsevier.com/insights/confidence-in-research/researcher-of-the-future.

Ethan J. Gantana et al., “An In-Depth Analysis of AI-Generated Scientific Review Articles and Its Potential Implications on the Future of Medical Journal Publications,” Next Research 2, no. 4 (2025): 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.101002.

Fangmin Wang et al., “Incubating AI: The Collaboratory at Ryerson University Library,” in The Rise of AI: Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries, edited by Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2022).

Federico Bianchi et al., “Exploring the Use of AI Authors and Reviewers at Agents4Science,” Nature Biotechnology 44 (2026): 12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02963-8.

Gasparini and Kautonen, “Understanding Artificial Intelligence in Research Libraries”.

Graphite, “More Articles Are Now Created by AI Than Humans,” October 2025, https://graphite.io/five-percent/more-articles-are-now-created-by-ai-than-humans.

Guojie Li, “AI4R: The Fifth Scientific Research Paradigm,” Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 39, no. 1 (2024), https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol39/iss1/1/.

Gwern Branwen, “LLM Daydreaming,” Gwern.Net, July 14, 2025, https://gwern.net/ai-daydreaming.

Hanchen Wang et al., “Scientific Discovery in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” Nature 620, no. 7972 (2023): 57, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2.

Haoyang Su et al., “Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by a LLM-Based Multi-Agent System,” paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vienna, Austria, July 27–August 1, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.09403.

Harrison Dekker et al., “URI Libraries’ AI Lab—Evolving to Meet the Needs of Students and Research Communities,” in The Rise of AI: Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries, edited by Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2022).

Hong Zhou, “Reimagining Scholarly Publishing Workflow: A High-Level Map of What Changes Next,” The Scholarly Kitchen, November 20, 2025, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/11/20/reimagining-scholarly-publishing-workflow-a-high-level-map-of-what-changes-next/.

James Lee and Xuemao Wang, “Libraries as Research Engines: AI Agents for Discovery through Language, Inference, and Network Structure,” paper presented at the Fantastic Futures Conference, London, United Kingdom, December 3–5, 2025, https://www.conftool.org/fantastic-futures-2025/index.php?page=browseSessions&form_session=6.

Jason Griffey, “Predictions about Future Technology in Libraries and Epistemic Collapse: Laws and Mindsets,” in Library 2035: Imaging the Next Generation of Libraries, edited by Sandra Hirsh (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2024), 15.

Jean-Christophe Plantin and Andrea Thomer, “Platforms, Programmability, and Precarity: The Platformization of Research Repositories in Academic Libraries,” New Media & Society 27, no. 1 (2025): 338, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231176758.

Jennifer Listgarten, “The Perpetual Motion Machine of AI-Generated Data and the Distraction of ChatGPT as a ‘Scientist,’” Nature Biotechnology 42, no. 3 (2024): 371–73, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02103-0.

Jiaqi Wei et al., “From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery,” preprint, arXiv, August 18, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14111.

Joe Castaldo, “Anthropic’s Release of AI Tools for Lawyers Prompts Massive Legal-Tech Sell-Off,” The Globe and Mail, February 3, 2026, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-anthropics-release-of-ai-tools-for-lawyers-prompts-massive-sell-off/.

Joeran Beel et al., “Evaluating Sakana’s AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?,” SIGIR Forum 59, no. 1 (2025): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1145/3769733.376974.

John Wihbey, “AI and Epistemic Risk for Democracy: A Coming Crisis of Public Knowledge?,” SSRN Scholarly Paper (Amsterdam: Social Science Research Network, 2024), 2, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4805026.

Jonathan Woahn, “AI Isn’t Going to Pay for Content … Part Two: The Path Forward,” The Scholarly Kitchen, January 29, 2026, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/01/29/guest-post-ai-isnt-going-to-pay-for-content-part-two-the-path-forward/.

Juraj Gottweis et al., “Towards an AI Co-Scientist,” preprint, arXiv, February 26, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18864.

Jutta Haider et al., “GPT-Fabricated Scientific Papers on Google Scholar: Key Features, Spread, and Implications for Preempting Evidence Manipulation,” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 5 (2024): 1–5, https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-156.

Kailyn Slater, “Against AI: Critical Refusal in the Library,” Library Trends 73, no. 4 (2025): 588–608, https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968497.

Karen Estlund and Cynthia Hudson Vitale, Strategic Implications of AI Futures for Research Libraries: Workshop Report (Chicago: Association of Research Libraries and Coalition for Networked Information, 2026), 24, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29242/report.futurescape2026.

Kari D. Weaver, “Artificial Intelligence and Transparency: Toward a Framework for Disclosure of AI Use in Learning, Research, and Publication,” Information Services and Use 46, nos. 1–2 (2026): 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1177/18758789261435716.

Kat Boboris, “Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category,” arXiv (blog), October 31, 2025, https://blog.arxiv.org/2025/10/31/attention-authors-updated-practice-for-review-articles-and-position-papers-in-arxiv-cs-category/?ref=404media.co.

Kate Murray and Joshua Sternfeld, Content Authenticity and Provenance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Call-to-Action for the LAMs Community (C2PA for G+LAM Community of Practice, 2026), 4, https://tinyurl.com/bdej7rd9.

Katherine Skinner et al., The State of Open Research Software Infrastructure (Invest in Open Infrastructure, 2025), 3, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14888589.

Kevin Baker, “Context Widows,” Artificial Bureaucracy (Substack), December 12, 2025, https://artificialbureaucracy.substack.com/p/context-widows.

Kunlun Zhu et al., “SafeScientist: Toward Risk-Aware Scientific Discoveries by LLM Agents,” preprint, arXiv, May 29, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.23559.

Kyle Wiggers, “Academics Accuse AI Startups of Co-Opting Peer Review for Publicity,” TechCrunch, March 19, 2025, https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/19/academics-accuse-ai-startups-of-co-opting-peer-review-for-publicity/.

Lai Ma, “The Platformisation of Scholarly Information and How to Fight It,” LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 33, no. 1 (2023): 2, https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.13561.

Lateef Ayinde et al., “Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Review of Current Practices, Challenges, and Research Opportunities,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 52, no. 1 (2026): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103185.

Leo S. Lo, “AI Literacy: A Guide for Academic Libraries,” College & Research Libraries News 86, no. 3 (2025): 120–22, https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.86.3.120.

Leo S. Lo, “Evaluating AI Literacy in Academic Libraries: A Survey Study with a Focus on U.S. Employees,” College & Research Libraries 85, no. 5 (2024): 649, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.5.635.

Leo S. Lo, “The CARE Approach for Academic Librarians: From Search First to Answer First with Generative AI,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 52, no. 1 (2026): 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103186.

Lisa Messeri and M. J. Crockett, “Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research,” Nature (London) 627, no. 8002 (2024): 49–58, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.

Lorcan Dempsey, “Generative AI and Libraries: 7 Contexts,” LorcanDempsey.Net, November 12, 2023, https://www.lorcandempsey.net/generative-ai-and-libraries-7-contexts/.

Lorcan Dempsey, “Generative AI, Scholarly and Cultural Language Models, and the Return of Content,” LorcanDempsey.Net, June 28, 2023, https://www.lorcandempsey.net/generative-ai-a-note-about-content/.

Love Börjeson et al., “Transfiguring the Library as Digital Research Infrastructure: Making KBLab at the National Library of Sweden,” College & Research Libraries 85, no. 4 (2024): 578, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.4.564.

M. Mahey et al., Open a GLAM Lab: Digital Cultural Heritage Innovation Labs (Doha, Qatar: Book Sprint, 2019), https://assets.pubpub.org/4kaopqbk/31574367506714.pdf.

Maksim E. Eren and Dorianis M. Perez, “Rethinking Science in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” preprint, arXiv, November 13, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.10524.

Manuel Alejandro Cruz-Aguilar, “The Epistemic Revolution of AI: Reconfiguring the Foundations of Scientific Knowledge,” AI & Society 41, no. 1 (2025): 14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02658-3.

Maria Couto Teixeira et al., “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research Methods: Between Hype and Risks?,” paper presented at the International Workshop on Chatbots and Human-Centred AI, Lübeck, Germany, November 12–13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08461v1.

Mark Daley, “Bartleby, the PI,” Noetic Engines (Substack), November 24, 2025, https://noeticengines.substack.com/p/bartleby-the-pi.

Mark Daley, “Rethinking the Role of Higher Education in an AI-Integrated World,” University Affairs, February 6, 2026, https://universityaffairs.ca/opinion/rethinking-the-role-of-higher-education-in-an-ai-integrated-world/.

Martin Frické, Artificial Intelligence and Librarianship: Notes for Teaching, 3rd ed. (Wanaka, NZ: SoftOption, 2024), https://softoption.us/sites/default/files/AIinLibrariesNotesForTeaching.pdf.

Masud Khokhar, “Imagining the Future Library,” Katina, October 30, 2025, 1, https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/future-of-work/2025/imagining-the-future-library.

Melanie Hibbert et al., “A Framework for AI Literacy,” EDUCAUSE Review: Emerging Technologies and Trends, June 3, 2024, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/a-framework-for-ai-literacy.

Michael Ridley and Danica Pawlick-Potts, “Algorithmic Literacy and the Role for Libraries,” Information Technology and Libraries 40, no. 2 (2021): 4, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963.

Mourad Gridach et al., “Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions,” arXiv, preprint, March 12, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08979.

Mrinank Sharma et al., “Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models,” preprint, arXiv, October 20, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548.

Nuno Sousa, “Ethical and Practical Implications of AI in Academic Library Research,” IFLA Journal, ahead of print, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251391753.

Oliver Hsu, “Autonomous Labs Accelerate Scientific Discovery,” A16z News, December 10, 2025, https://www.a16z.news/i/181164050/oliver-hsu-autonomous-labs-accelerate-scientific-discovery.

Olivia Guest et al., “Against the Uncritical Adoption of ‘AI’ Technologies in Academia,” preprint, PhilArchive, 2025, https://philarchive.org/archive/GUEATU.

“Previewing Locus,” Intology (blog), November 19, 2025, https://www.intology.ai/blog/previewing-locus.

Qiguang Chen et al., “AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research,” preprint, arXiv, July 2, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.01903.

Ramón Alvarado, “AI as an Epistemic Technology,” Science and Engineering Ethics 29, no. 5 (2023): 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00451-3.

Richard Watermeyer et al., “Generative AI and the Automating of Academia,” Postdigital Science and Education (Cham) 6, no. 2 (2024): 461, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00440-6.

Ryan Cordell, Machine Learning + Libraries: A Report on the State of the Field (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2020), 41, https://labs.loc.gov/static/labs/work/reports/Cordell-LOC-ML-report.pdf.

Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley, Building an AI Literacy Framework: Perspectives from Instruction Librarians and Currently Information Literacy Tools (Chicago: American Library Association, 2024), https://www.choice360.org/research/white-paper-building-an-ai-literacy-framework-perspectives-from-instruction-librarians-and-current-information-literacy-tools/.

Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley, eds., The Rise of AI: Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2022).

Sarah G. Park, “AI and Systematic Reviews: Can AI Tools Replace Librarians in the Systematic Search Process?,” Science & Technology Libraries 45, no. 2 (2025): 21, https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2025.2521519.

Shuo Ren et al., “Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-Based Scientific Agents,” version 3, preprint, arXiv, February 2, 2026, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.24047.

Shyam Sharma, “Universities and AI: Rebuilding the Commons,” The RhetAI Coalition (Substack), January 16, 2026, https://rhetaicoalition.substack.com/p/universities-and-ai-rebuilding-the.

Simon Chesterman and Loy Hui Chieh, “Research Integrity and Academic Authority in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Curation?,” preprint, arXiv, January 9, 2026, 3, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.05574.

Tanisha Jowsey et al., “We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research,” SSRN Scholarly Paper (Amsterdam: Social Science Research Network, 2025), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5676462.

The Royal Society, Science in the Age of AI: How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing the Nature and Method of Scientific Research (London, UK: The Royal Society, 2024), 5, https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/science-in-the-age-of-ai/science-in-the-age-of-ai-report.pdf.

Tracy Bergstrom and Dylan Ruediger, A Third Transformation? Generative AI and Scholarly Publishing New York: ITHAKA S+R, 2024) https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.321519.

Tracy Bergstrom et al., The Second Digital Transformation of Scholarly Publishing: Strategic Context and Shared Infrastructure (New York: ITHAKA S+R, 2024), 22, doi.org/10.18665/sr.320210.

Ulkar Aghayeva, “Looking for Hidden Gems in Scientific Literature: The Promise and Practice of Literature-Based Discovery,” Elicit, October 20, 2025, https://elicit.com/blog/literature-based-discovery.

Veronica Showers et al., “AI Readiness and the New Value Equation in Scholarly Publishing,” The Scholarly Kitchen, February 24, 2026, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/02/24/guest-post-ai-readiness-and-the-new-value-equation-in-scholarly-publishing/.

Violet Fox, “AI Refusal in Libraries: A Starter Guide,” ACRLog (blog), June 11, 2025, https://acrlog.org/2025/06/11/ai-refusal-in-libraries-a-starter-guide/.

Wang et al., “Scientific Discovery in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.”

Will Douglas Heaven, “OpenAI Is Throwing Everything into Building a Fully Automated Researcher,” MIT Technology Review, March 20, 2026, https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/03/20/1134438/openai-is-throwing-everything-into-building-a-fully-automated-researcher/.

Woahn, “AI Isn’t Going to Pay for Content.”

Xiaoxu Ling and Siyuan Yan, “Understanding Algorithmic Aversion: A Bold Rejection of Digital Dominion,” Communications of the ACM 69, no. 3 (2026): 28, https://doi.org/10.1145/3758088.

Yoshua Bengio et al., “Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?,” preprint, arXiv, February 21, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15657.

Yu Zhu et al., “How Does Information Resource Value of AI-Generated Content Emerge? An Exploratory Study from the User Evaluation Perspective,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 77, no. 5 (2026): 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70061.

Yutaro Yamada et al., “The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search,” preprint, arXiv, April 10, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08066.

Yves Gendron et al., “The Perils of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Publishing,” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 87 (2022): 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102411.

“Zochi Publishes A* Paper,” Intology (blog), May 27, 2025, https://www.intology.ai/blog/zochi-acl.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-21

How to Cite

Ridley, M. (2026). Artificial Research Intelligence: Autonomously AI-Generated Science and the Implications for Research Libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v45i3.17706