What’s in a word? : Rethinking facet headings in a discovery service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5629Abstract
The emergence of Discovery systems has been well received by libraries who have long been concerned with offering a smorgasbord of databases that require either individual searching of databases or the problematic use of federated searching. The ability to search across a wide array of subscribed and open-access information resources via a centralized index has opened up access for users to a library’s wealth of information resources. This capability has been particularly praised for its ‘google like’ search interface, thereby conforming to user expectations for information searching. Yet, all discovery services also include facets as a search capability and thus provide faceted navigation which is a search feature that Google is not particularly well suited for. Discovery services thus provide a hybrid search interface. An examination of e-commerce sites clearly shows that faceted navigation is an integral part of their discovery systems. Many library OPACs also now are being developed with faceted navigation capabilities. However, the discovery services faceted structures suffer from a number of problems which inhibit their usefulness and their potential. This article examines a number of these issues and it offers suggestions for improving the discovery search interface. It also argues that vendors and libraries need to work together to more closely analyze the user experience of the discovery system.
References
LOEX Conference program, (Grand Rapids, Michigan, May 8-10, 2014), http://www.loexconference.org/2014/LOEX%202014%20FINAL%20%27050514%27.pdf.
Paige Alfonzo, “My Library Usability Study Stage 1,” Librarian Enumerations (blog), June 19, 2013, http://librarianenumerations.wordpress.com/2013/06/19/library-usability-study/.
Alison J. Head, Learning the Ropes: How Freshmen Conduct Course Research Once They Enter College, (Project Information Literacy, 2013).
Andrew Anderson, “Search Magic,” An Anthropology of Algorithms (blog), December 5, 2011, http://www.andrewasher.net/anthropologyofalgorithms/search-magic/.
Paul Anthony, "8 Eyetracking Studies from the Web’s Biggest Blogs," Webdistortion, August 11, 2010, http://www.webdistortion.com/2010/08/11/eyetracking-studies-biggest-blogs/.
Andrew D. Asher, Lynda M. Duke and Suzanne Wilson, “Paths of Discovery: Comparing the Search effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and Conventional Library Resources,” College and Research Libraries 74, no. 5 (2013): 464-488.
Susan Avery and Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, “Hopes, Impressions, and Reality: is a Discovery Layer the Answer?” (program, LOEX 2014 Annual Conference, Grand Rapids, Michigan, May 8-10, 2014), http://www.loexconference.org/2014/presentations/'LOEX2014_'Hopes%20Impressions%20and%20Reality-AveryHinchliffe.pdf.
William Badke, “Pushing a Big Rock Up a Hill All Day: Promoting Information Literacy Skills,” Online Searcher 37, no. 6 (2013): 67.
Xue Bai, “In Google We Trust: Consumers' Perception of Search Engine Optimization and Its Potential Impact on Online Information Search” (master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, 2013), i, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/147494.
“Banner Blindness Studies,” BannerBlindness.org, accessed April 7, 2014, http://bannerblindness.org/banner-blindness-studies/.
Kathleen Bauer and Alice Peterson-Hart, “Does Faceted Display in a Library Catalog Increase Use of Subject Headings?,” Library Hi Tech 30, no. 2 (2012): 354.
Vanda Broughton, “Meccano, Molecules, and the Organization of Knowledge: The Continuing Contribution of S.R. Ranganathan” (presentation, International Society for Knowledge Organization UK chapter, London, November 5, 2007), 2, http://www.iskouk.org/presentations/vanda_broughton.pdf.
Vanda Broughton, “The Need for a Faceted Classification as the Basis of All Methods of Information Retrieval,” Aslib Proceedings 58, no. 1/2 (2006): 49-72.
William F. Chickering and Sharon Q. Yang, “Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update,” Information Technology and Libraries 33, no. 2 (2014), doi: 10.6017/ital.v33i2.3471
Elizabeth F. Churchill, “Putting the Person Back into Personalization,” Elizabeth F. Churchill (blog), July 24, 2013, http://elizabethchurchill.com/uncategorized/putting-the-person-back-into-personalization/.
Elise Conradi, “to_be_classified: A Facet Analysis of a Folksonomy” (master’s thesis, Oslo University College, 2009), 12, https://oda.hio.no/jspui/handle/10642/313.
Robert Detmering and Anna Marie Johnson, “’Research Papers Have Always Seemed Very Daunting’: Information Literacy Narratives and the Student Research Experience,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 12, no. 1 (2012): 5-22.
Ruth Dickstein and Vicki Mills, “Usability Testing at the University of Arizona Library: How to Let the Users in on the Design,” Information Technology and Libraries 19: no. L3 (2000): 144-151.
Helen Dunford, review of Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries, by Mary Pagliero Popp and Diane Dallis, The Australian Library Journal, 62, no. 2 (2013): 175-176.
Jody Condit Fagan, “Usability Studies of Faceted Browsing: A Literature Review,” Information Technology and Libraries 29, no. 2 (2010): 62.
Jody Condit Fagan, “Discovery Tools and Information Literacy,” Journal of Web Librarianship 5, no. 3 (2011): 171-178.
Amy F. Fyn, Vera Lux and Robert J. Snyder, "Reflections on Teaching and Tweaking a Discovery Layer," Reference Services Review 41, no. 1 (2013): 113 - 124.
Melissa Gross and Don Latham, “Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Literacy: Defining, Attaining, and Self-Assessing Skills,” College & Research Libraries 70, no. 4 (2009): 336-350.
Alison J. Head, Learning the Ropes: How Freshmen Conduct Course Research Once They Enter College, (Project Information Literacy, 2013). http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreport.pdf.
Marti A. Hearst, “Design Recommendations for Hierarchical Faceted Search Interfaces,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Workshop on Faceted Search (2006), http://flamenco.sims.berkeley.edu/papers/faceted-workshop06.pdf.
Robin Marantz Henig and Samantha Henig, Twentysomething: Why do Young Adults Seem Stuck? (New York: Hudson Street Press, 2012), 139-143.
Chris Jasek, “How to design library websites to maximize usability,” Library Connect, Pamphlet 5 (2007): 4, http://libraryconnectarchive.elsevier.com/lcp/0502/lcp0502.pdf.
John Kupersmith, “Library Terms that Users Understand” (University of California, 2012), http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qq499w7.
Kathryn La Barre, “Traditions of Facet Theory, or a Garden of Forking Paths?,” in Facets of Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the ISKO UK Second Biennial Conference, 4th-5th July, 2011, London (Bingley, U.K. : Emerald Group, 2012): 96.
Dirk Lewandowski, “A Framework for Evaluating the Retrieval Effectiveness of Search Engines,” in Next Generation Search Engine: Advanced models for information retrieval (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012): 1-24.
Theodore Levitt, “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard Business Review 38, no. 4 (1960): 45-56.
Irene Lopatovska, Megan R. Fenton and Sara Campot, “Examining Preferences for Search Engines and Their Effects on Information Behavior,” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49, no. 1 (2012): 1-11.
Jia Mi and Cathy Wang, “Revitalizing the Library OPAC: Interface, Searching, and Display Challenges,” Information Technology and Libraries (2008): 5-22.
Jack Mills and Vanda Broughton, Bliss Bibliographic Classification: Introduction and Auxiliary Schedules, 2nd ed. (London: Butterworth, 1977).
Matti Näsi and Leena Koivusilta, “Internet and Everyday Life: The Perceived Implications of Internet Use on Memory and Ability to Concentrate,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, no. 2 (2013): 88-93.
Saverio Perugini, “Personalization by Website Transformation: Theory and Practice,” Information Processing & Management 46, no. 3 (2010): 284.
Sarah Ramdeen and Bradley M. Hemminger, “A Tale of Two Interfaces: How Facets Affect the Library Catalog Search,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (2012): 702-715.
Ritika Puri, "5 Usability Lessons from Website Eye Tracking Studies," The Daily Egg, November 8, 2013, http://blog.crazyegg.com/2012/11/08/lessons-eye-tracking-studies/
Sarah Ramdeen and Bradley M. Hemminger, “A Tale of Two Interfaces: How Facets Affect the Library Catalog Search,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (2012): 702-715.
Frank Scharnell, “Guide to eCommerce Facets, Filters and Categories,” The YouMoz Blog, April 30, 2013, http://moz.com/ugc/guide-to-ecommerce-facets-filters-and-categories.
Betsy Sparrow, Jenny Liu and Daniel M. Wegner, “Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips,” Science 333, no. 6043 (2011): 776-778.
Joshua Steimle, “What Does SEO Cost? [Infographic],” (September 12, 2013), http://www.forbes.com/sites/joshsteimle/2013/09/12/what-does-seo-cost-infographic/.
Beth Thomsett-Scott and Patricia E. Reese, “Academic Libraries and Discovery Tools: A Survey of the Literature,” College & Undergraduate Libraries 19, no. 2-4 (2012): 123-143.
Celia Thompson, Kathleen Gray and Hyejeong Kim, “How Social are Social Media Technologies (SMTs)? A Linguistic Analysis of University Students' Experiences of Using SMTs for Learning,” The Internet and Higher Education 21 (2014): 31-40, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.001.
Daniel Tunkelang, Faceted Search (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2009) ; Hai Zhuge and Yorick Wilks, “Faceted Search, Social Networking and Interactive Semantics,” World Wide Web 17, no. 4 (2014), doi: 10.1007/s11280-013-0216-6.
Anja van der Lans and Peter van Til, “Enterprise Information management (EIM),” in Enterprise Information Management, ed. by Paul Baan (New York: Springer, 2013).
Brian Wallace, “The Death of Brick and Mortar,” Infographic Journal (February 28, 2014), http://infographicjournal.com/the-death-of-brick-and-mortar/.
Daniel M. Wegner and Adrian F. Ward, “How Google Is Changing Your Brain,” Scientific
American 309, no. 6 (2013): 58-61.
Leonard Will, “Rigorous Facet Analysis as the Basis for Constructing Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) of All Kinds.” Paper presented at 2013 ISKO UK Conference, London, July 8-9, 2013: http://www.iskouk.org/conf2013/papers/WillPaper.pdf.
.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Information Technology and Libraries
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.
